|
|
|
|
|
Introduction: It is widely believed that life
insurance is never bought but it is always sold. That's not really true,
since most of us really do need life insurance to protect those who are
financially dependant on us. But it
is the type of life insurance policy and how much you buy where the saying
holds true. |
|
|
|
|
Unethical sales practices aren't new and not
restricted to any one industry. The
classic customer warning, "caveat emptor," dates to ancient Rome.
The phrase "ethical selling" quickly is becoming just an
oxymoron. Someone who buys a wrong Unit linked insurance plan is hurt a lot
more than someone who buys a fake cannon camera for Rsxx. The various sales
pitches as discussed below may not be exercised by all of those in the
profession, however, an understanding of them may help you in dealing more
effectively the next time someone comes calling. |
|
|
|
|
The unit-linked insurance plans are believed to
be transparent and it has become it forte to a large extent. The various
charges and their application are explicitly revealed in the brochures and
also the various investment avenues wherein your funds are going to be
invested are disclosed. When everything is overboard, then how come, the
industry is plagued with mis-selling? Perhaps, the communication that takes
place between the agent and you is leading to such mis-selling practices.
Its not that something is represented wrongly but a lot many times, there
is concealment of facts. Below, we look at some of these sales pitches that
may fall under the norms of mis-selling. |
|
|
|
|
The reality: Nothing is free. Ulips charge for
the insurance cover through a cost called ‘mortality charge’. Mutual funds
are a pure investment instrument whereas a Ulip bundles life cover with
investment. Both give you options to invest in debt and equity products and
target less or more risk-bearing returns. |
|
What to do: Determine what works for you. Funds
are for those who can systematically invest on their own, Ulips for those
who need regular nudges. |
|
|
|
|
The reality: Equity Ulips have done in the past
three years because the markets have done well. Ask for return history in
comparison to their benchmarks. The BSE 100 has given annualised return of
57.35% last year and 50.72% over the last three years, as on 31 Oct 2007. |
|
What to do: Check the return the agent is
pushing against the above returns. |
|
|
|
|
The reality: Most Ulips have an option to stop
paying premiums after the first three. The plan will continue, but you do
pay for it. The cost of the life cover will come from your invested money
through redemption of units to pay for the mortality charge each year.
These charges will eat into your total returns in the long term. |
|
What to do: If you want life cover with
investment, do NOT take ‘holidays’ in premium payments unless hard strapped
for funds. |
|
|
|
|
The reality: The agent is maximising his
commission. You are losing not just your long term objective but also the
benefit of compounding by doing this. There is no correlation between low
NAV of the fund and its potential returns. Worse, you are incurring a huge
cost in buying a new plan, as most of these plans are front-loaded (first
year commission is as high as 20-30 per cent and then it falls) in charges. |
|
What to do: Continue with your old plan. Say NO
to churn. |
|
|
|
|
The reality: This is a common pitch for those
who are looking to save taxes by investing through Ulips. If it is indeed a
shorter term investment you are making, you will find equity funds much
cheaper at a front load cost of just 1.25 per cent compared to the 20-30
per cent that Ulips charge. |
|
What to do: Decide your holding period before
you invest. |
|
|
|
|
The reality: Ulips have many charges. You don’t
know which charge the agent is talking about. Most investors know about the
Premium Allocation Charge (PAC) so many recent launches have come with
Ulips with low or nil PAC. This however, has been taken care of by increasing
or charging the cost under a different expense head called the policy
administration charge. Unlike the PAC that is directly visible being
applied on the premium that one pays, the policy administration charge gets
charged to the fund value and hence goes unnoticed. |
|
Some plans have low or Nil front-end charge.
Instead, the cost is taken care of by the policy administration charge that
gets adjusted from the fund value and hence goes unnoticed. |
|
What to do: Ask for an internal rate of return
of the produce and compare with others in the market. If the agent does not
know IRR, find one who does. |
|
|
|
|
The reality: The plan you buy from a life
insurance company by making a single lump sum payment is not a bond but a
life insurance policy. There is no assurance or guaranteed return on these
single premium Ulip unlike a bond. Also, make sure to keep the sum assured
equal to 5 times or 500 percent of your invested amount so as to get
tax-free amount on maturity. Generally there is an option to keep it at 125
percent of investment amount and the agent may let you choose it for higher
returns. (as less mortality is deducted) |
|
What to do: There are no guarantees in a Ulip. |
|
|
|
|
The reality: Returns from all unit linked
insurance plans are totally subject to market fluctuations. Even high
returns from the past cannot be taken for granted as there uncertainty
attached to the movements of both debt and equity markets. The insurance
regulatory and development authority (IRDA) has specified that all
projections to be discussed with the customers need to be at 6 or 10
percent growth rate. |
|
What to do: Ask for the internal rate of return
of the plan. The stock market can
give 15-17 per cent in the long run per year. Anything promised over that
is hype. |
|
|
|
|
The reality: Buying pure term insurance plan,
that is, insurance in its purest form, is harder at times. The agents are
not willingly ready to ‘sell’ such a plan to you. The reason being the
lower premium amounts and hence lower commission earnings. The modus opearndi:
Term plan premium multiplied by term is the money lost. Had the same funds
be invested even for shorter period in a Ulip would come with huge returns
over same period. There is life cover also during this period. The above
logic may not hold true in all cases. |
|
What to do: Buy a high value term plan if you
need a large life cover. |
|
|
|
|
The reality: There are certain Ulips that do not
ask for same premium amount to be invested every year. One may reduce the
premium from second year onwards. By doing so, one you are treating the
Ulip as an investment instrument and two, you keep a shorter-term view in
your plan. Both are dangerous when it come to buying a Ulip. With inflows
into the fund reducing there is as much pressure on the fund to take care
of mortality charges so that the plan continues with life coverage. |
|
What to do: Increase, not decrease your
contribution, if you are targeting a long term corpus. |
|
|
|
|
The reality: There is noting wrong in the above
pitch. However, there is many a slip between the cup and the lip that goes
un-communicated. There are certain Ulips that not just provide the sum
assured to the nominees on death but also waive off the premiums. By waiving
off the premiums it means, the insurer now starts putting in the same
amount of premium into the fund as was being done by the policyholder when
he was alive. But you pay a higher price for such a plan. |
|
What to do: Know that there is nothing free and
look for the price tag everywhere. |
|
|
|
|
The reality: This sales pitch has already been
banned in many countries. Mostly used in an endowment policy wherein the
premiums need to be paid for the entire duration of the plan. Such policies
rely on the bonuses declared by the insurance companies based on their
profitability. If the company does have a good year, the percentage of
bonus could be high. If you leave this bonus amount in your policy to build
up with your cash value after a few years, you could have enough cash value
in the policy to pay the premiums. This scenario is possible, but not
guaranteed, and perhaps not even probable. |
|
The "vanishing premiums" scenario
depends on three big "IFs:" Only if the insurer has consistent
good years; Only if the company pays high bonuses; Only if you do not
withdraw cash value. |
|
What to do: No free lunches. Check for costs. |
|