What did the Court say?
The Rajasthan High rejected the petition after noting the following key factors:
WhatsApp chats found during the search were corroborated by images of cash books and some other physical records that were seized by the tax officials from Om Kothari Group
The chats mentioned some specific plots which also matched figures in the cash books
The tax department had already recorded a satisfaction note before initiating action against the petitioner, as required by the law.
(It’s important to know that any assessment under Section 153C mandates the recording of satisfaction by the Assessing Officer (AO) upon discovery of material likely to "have a bearing on the determination of the total income.")
The Court noted:
“The persons having the WhatsApp chats were connected with both the companies herein and the transactions were regarding specific plots and the details of cash payment were clearly contained in the WhatsApp chat, thus with such specific inputs, the same cannot be said to be vague or hit by the strict parameters of Section 153C of the Act of 1961.”
In its judgment, the Court clarified that while WhatsApp messages alone might not be sufficient, in this particular case they were supported by other evidence. This made the messages credible material for initiating action under Section 153C.