News

8th Pay Commission: Civilian Pensioners Demand ‘One Rank, One Pension’

Civilian pensioner groups are seeking OROP-style pension parity, asking the 8th Pay Commission to address differences arising from retirement under different pay structures

AI
8th Pay Commission Photo: AI
info_icon
Summary

Summary of this article

  • Civilian pensioners seek OROP-style pension parity

  • Demand covers Pay Matrix Levels 1 to 18

  • Pension parity remains under consideration

The 8th Pay Commission is examining several proposals concerning salaries and retirement benefits for central government employees and pensioners. Among the prominent demands before the commission is the extension of the One Rank, One Pension (OROP) principle to central government civilian employees and pensioners. The demand is being raised by employee and pensioner organisations seeking greater parity in pension calculations for people who retired from comparable posts but at different points in time. The proposal covers civilian employees across Pay Matrix Levels 1-18.

What Is The OROP Principle?

Pension is linked to the same rank and length of service, rather than being determined solely by the date on which an individual retired, under the OROP framework. The system is currently associated primarily with defence personnel, although OROP-type pension arrangements also applies to certain constitutional and judicial offices.

For defence pensioners, the government has periodically revised pensions under the OROP framework. The Department of Ex-Servicemen Welfare continues to publish revisions and related orders.

Civilian pensioners, however, generally have their pensions revised through the recommendations of successive Central Pay Commissions and subsequent government decisions. Employee and pensioner bodies argue that pension differences can emerge when people who held comparable positions and completed similar periods of service retire under different pay structures. When a new Pay Commission revises the salaries of serving employees, later retirees may receive pensions based on the revised pay structure. But those who retired early may not automatically receive an equivalent pension calculated on the same basis.

The demand has become particularly relevant as the 8th Pay Commission considers changes to the pay and pension structure. Employee organisations have submitted memoranda covering several retirement-related issues, including pension parity and notional fixation.

Other Pension Demands Before The Commission

OROP is not the only pension-related issue being raised. Employee organisations have also sought changes involving pension fixation, restoration of commuted pension and other retirement benefits.

The National Council-Joint Consultative Machinery’s staff side has also submitted a memorandum containing several proposals concerning employees and pensioners.

The 8th Pay Commission’s recommendations will be closely watched by both serving employees and retirees. At present, the extension of OROP to civilian pensioners remains a demand under consideration, rather than an approved change in pension rules.

Published At:
CLOSE