Real Estate

India’s Urban Housing Crisis Mirrors New York, Artificial Scarcity, Rigid Norms To Blame, Says Sarthak Ahuja

With a Price-to-Income ratio of 11, owning a home in Indian metros now rivals that of New York, investment banker Sarthak Ahuja wrote in a post on LinkedIn. He cited several factors, including rigid laws, artificial scarcity by builders and opaque ownership patterns, as reasons for this rise in home prices. He advised buyers to stay on rent, build wealth and buy only if they could afford a 50 per cent down payment

India’s Urban Housing Crisis Mirrors New York, Artificial Scarcity, Rigid Norms To Blame, Says Sarthak Ahuja
info_icon

The Indian dream of homeownership is becoming increasingly unattainable, especially in its urban centres, with property prices outpacing income growth by a staggering margin.

Investment banker Sarthak Ahuja, in a widely discussed LinkedIn post, broke down the structural problems making city housing nearly impossible for the average Indian to afford—and how deeply embedded these issues are.

“If you look at the Price to Income (P2I) Ratio for houses in India—or the number of years’ income you have to pay to afford a house—urban cities now average a P2I of 11. That means 11 years of full income. And if you assume 50 per cent of your income goes into expenses, that’s over 20 years of savings,” he wrote in his post on LinkedIn.

Advertisement

Ahuja noted that this P2I ratio, which now averages 11 across Indian metros, is on par with New York, a city often cited as one of the world’s most expensive real estate markets.

Three Structural Fault Lines

According to Ahuja, three entrenched issues are driving housing further out of reach:

Rigid Building Norms: India’s existing floor space regulations are restricting vertical growth. “India has a very low FSI or Floor Space Index. Most metros have an FSI of 1.3 to 3.5, which keeps building heights low. More land is needed to house the same number of people,” he wrote.

Advertisement

In comparison, the average FSI is 15 in the U.S. and 25 in Singapore, enabling more efficient urban housing.

Artificial Scarcity by Developers: Developers are gaming supply dynamics to inflate prices. “Private developers play a dirty game. They’ll release only 5 units for sale in a 100-unit project to set inflated prices through scarcity. The next 5 go for 10 per cent more. This keeps the illusion of demand high while pushing up rates,” he added.

Real Estate as a Cash Parking Tool: Ahuja also pointed to the opaque ownership patterns and role of unaccounted wealth in distorting the market. “It is said that less than 10 families own 20 per cent of the land in Mumbai, and 500 families own half of Mumbai,” he added.

Advertisement

What Can Homebuyers Do?

In a market where financial prudence is often sidelined through speculation, Ahuja had some advice for buyers.

“Buy a house when you can afford at least 50 per cent upfront, and keep equated monthly instalments (EMIs) under 35 per cent of your in-hand income. If not, live on rent and build income. Tier 2 cities may be a smarter option than metros,” he said. 

CLOSE