News

False Claim Of Unemployment By Wife: Allahabad High Court Quashes Maintenance Order Passed In Her Favour

The Allahabad High Court set aside a maintenance order passed in favour of wife by the family court, upon finding that she hid the truth about her employment

AI Generated
Allahabad High Court quashes wife’s maintenance after finding false unemployment claim Photo: AI Generated
info_icon
Summary

Summary of this article

  • Allahabad High Court cancels maintenance as wife hid employment and income facts.

  • Woman claimed to be jobless but admitted earning Rs 36,000 in cross‑examination.

  • Judge noted suppression of facts and stressed honesty in court affidavits.

The Allahabad High Court has set aside a lower court order mandating a man to pay maintenance to his estranged wife, observing that she earns her living and did not reveal the true salary in her affidavit.

Justice Madan Pal Singh also allowed a criminal revision petition filed by the man, Ankit Saha.

"A perusal of the impugned judgment indicates that in the affidavit filed before the trial court, the opposite party herself admitted that she is a post-graduate and a web designer by qualification. She is working as a senior sales coordinator in a company and getting a salary of Rs 34,000 per month," the court said in the December 3 order.

"But in her cross-examination, she has admitted that she was earning Rs 36,000 per month. Such an amount for a wife who has no other liability cannot be said to be meagre; whereas the man has the responsibility of maintaining his aged parents and other social obligations," it observed.

The high court observed that the woman was not entitled to get any maintenance from her husband" as she is an earning lady and able to maintain herself".

The man's counsel argued in court that the estranged wife did not reveal the whole truth in the affidavit. "She claimed herself to be an illiterate and unemployed woman. When the document filed by the man was shown to her before the trial court, she admitted her income during cross-examination. Thus, it is clear that she did not come before the trial court with clean hands," the counsel submitted.

The court, in its order, said, "Cases of those litigants who have no regard for the truth and those who indulge in suppressing material facts need to be thrown out of the court."

It impugned the lower court's February 17 judgment and order, passed by the principal judge of a family court in Gautam Buddh Nagar and allowed the criminal revision petition filed by the man.

Published At:
CLOSE